Quote of the Week #125 - Divine Grace and Self-effort
We need divine grace as well as skillful self-effort to
overcome our tendency to let useless desires dominate our intelligence and
clarity of mind.
--Sandra Anderson
Thursday, November 29, 2018
Sunday, November 11, 2018
Quote of the Week #124 - Silence and Solitude
Quote of the Week #124
- Silence and Solitude
[Dialogue with Ramana Maharshi; D = Devotee posing a
question; M = Ramana responding to the question]
D: Is a vow of silence useful?
M: The inner Silence is self-surrender. And that is living
without the sense of ego.
D: Is solitude necessary for a Sannyasin [one who takes vows of renunciation]?
M: Solitude is in the mind of
a man. One might be in the thick of the world and yet maintain perfect serenity
of mind; such a person is always in solitude. Another may stay in the forest,
but still be unable to control his mind. He cannot be said to be in solitude.
Solitude is an attitude of the mind; a man attached to the things of life
cannot get solitude, wherever he may be. A detached man is always in solitude.
D: What is Mouna [This
term designates a person who is practicing not speaking for a period of time as
a spiritual discipline or condition; Ramana often went into this state for
extended periods]?
M: That State which
transcends speech and thought is Mouna; it is meditation without mental
activity. Subjugation of the mind is meditation: deep meditation is eternal
speech. Silence is ever-speaking; it is the perennial flow of ‘language’. It is
interrupted by speaking; for words obstruct this mute ‘language’. Lecturers may
entertain individuals for hours without improving them. Silence, on the other
hand, is permanent and benefits the whole of humanity…By Silence, Eloquence is
meant. Oral lectures are not so eloquent as Silence. Silence is unceasing
Eloquence…It is the best Language. There is a state when words cease and
Silence prevails.
D: How then can we
communicate our thoughts to one another?
M: That becomes necessary if
the sense of duality exists…
D: Why does not Bhagavan [an
honorific, referring to Ramana Maharshi] go about and preach the Truth to the
people at large?
M: How do you know I am not
doing it? Does preaching consist in mounting a platform and haranguing the
people around? Preaching is simple communication of Knowledge; it can really be
done in Silence only. What do you think of a man who listens to a sermon for an
hour and goes away without having been impressed by it so as to change his
life? Compare him with another, who sits in a holy Presence and goes away after
some time with his outlook on life totally changed. Which is the better, to
preach loudly without effect or to sit silently sending out Inner Force?
Again, how does speech arise? There is abstract
Knowledge, whence arises the ego, which in turn gives rise to thought, and
thought of the spoken word. So the word is the great-grandson of the original
Source. If the word can produce effect, judge for yourself, how much more
powerful must be the Preaching through Silence! But people do not understand
this simple, bare truth, the Truth of their everyday, ever-present, eternal
experience. This Truth is that of the Self. Is there anyone unaware of the
Self? But they do not like even to hear of this Truth, whereas they are eager
to know what lies beyond, about heaven, hell and reincarnation.
--From Maharshi’s Gospel,
Books I & II
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)